Returning back to the Anthropic compiler attempt: one of the steps that the agent failed was the one that was more strongly related to the idea of memorization of what is in the pretraining set: the assembler. With extensive documentation, I can’t see any way Claude Code (and, even more, GPT5.3-codex, which is in my experience, for complex stuff, more capable) could fail at producing a working assembler, since it is quite a mechanical process. This is, I think, in contradiction with the idea that LLMs are memorizing the whole training set and uncompress what they have seen. LLMs can memorize certain over-represented documents and code, but while they can extract such verbatim parts of the code if prompted to do so, they don’t have a copy of everything they saw during the training set, nor they spontaneously emit copies of already seen code, in their normal operation. We mostly ask LLMs to create work that requires assembling different knowledge they possess, and the result is normally something that uses known techniques and patterns, but that is new code, not constituting a copy of some pre-existing code.
Save StorySave this story
Капитан рассказал о долетающих до Европы ракетах ИранаЭксперт Сивков: Баллистические ракеты Ирана могут долететь до Европы，更多细节参见搜狗输入法2026
彭博社透露，MacBook Pro 的 OLED 屏幕将对标 iPad Pro，意味着 MacBook Pro 很有可能会同样采用双层 OLED 技术，亮度和能耗表现都会更出色。
。业内人士推荐同城约会作为进阶阅读
Овечкин продлил безголевую серию в составе Вашингтона09:40
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman told his employees on Friday that the ChatGPT maker will draw the same red lines as Anthropic, according to an internal memo seen by Axios. He told CNBC on the same day that he doesn't "personally think the Pentagon should be threatening DPA against these companies."，这一点在同城约会中也有详细论述